EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI MENGGUNAKAN MODEL COBIT FRAMEWORK 5.0 (STUDI KASUS: POLITEKNIK LP3I JAKARTA)
Abstract
Abstract
This research aims to discuss about condition of information technology governance at 16 of campus Politeknik LP3I Jakarta. This research aims to determine the extent to which 16 of campus Politeknik LP3I Jakarta have implemented good IT governance. This research focused only on the two dominant COBIT 5.0 PO and ME consists of 96 detailed control objectives while the AI and DS domain has been judged to meet the standards of good management of information technology is at level 3 (defined). Whilst the instrument rated by supervisors themselves, interviews and direct observation to collect the data. The third method is based on the Model COBIT 5.0. The data processing will be used to look for the weaknesses found in each domain. The finding weaknesses or problems will be compared with the ideal conditions that have been set COBIT 5.0 at each level, so that it can be seen that suitable recommendations to be implemented. The main problem encountered is the management do not understand the importance of investing in information technology, risk management has not been well managed, and ability SDM are still lacking. Control technology resulting in a weak, high cost of information technology is not accompanied by a return value in improving the effectiveness, efficiency and profits.
Keywords: COBIT 5.0, information technology governance, Politeknik LP3I JakartaReferences
Ahuja , S. 2009. Integration of COBIT, Balanced Scorecard and SSE-CMM as a strategic Information Security Management (ISM) framework.
Al Omari, L., Barnes , P., & Pitman , G. 2012. Optimising COBIT 5 for IT Governance: Examples from the Public Sector. International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Information Systems Research.
Alhan, M. 2011. Perancangan It Governance Menggunakan Cobit Versi 4.1. Politeknosains , 10.
Benaroch , M., & Chernobai , A. 2012. It Operational Risk Events As Cobit Control Failures: A Conceptualization And Empirical Examination. (D. B. Daphne Raban, Ed.) Proceedings of the 6th Israel Association for Information Systems (ILAIS) Conference.
Best , P., & Buckby , S. 2005. Development of a Board IT Governance (ITG) Review Model.
Betz , C. 2011. ITIL®, COBIT®, and CMMI®: Ongoing Confusion of Process and Function .
Bloomberg, B. 2011. Corporate Image Award 2011, Indonesia's Most Admired Companies. Corporate Image Award 2011.
Bowen , P., Cheung , M.-Y. D., & Rohde , F. 2007. Enhancing IT governance practices: A model and case study of an organization's efforts. nternational Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8, 191-221.
Deighton, Dix , Graham , & Skinner . 2009. Governance And Risk Management In United Kingdom Insurance Companies.
Enslin, Z. 2012. Cloud computing adoption: Control objectives for information and related technology (COBIT) - mapped risks and risk mitigating controls. African Journal of Business Management , 6, 37.
Etzler, J. 2007. How does the IT performance within one of the largest investment banks in the world compare to COBIT? . Master Thesis Stockholm, 14.
Fernández , A., & Liorens , F. 2009. An IT Governance Framework for Universities in Spain.
Flores , W., Sommestad , T., Holm , H., & Ekstedt , M. 2011. Assessing Future Value of Investments in Security-Related IT Governance Control Objectives – Surveying IT Professionals. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation , 14.
Goldschmidt , T., Dittrich , A., & Malek , M. 2007. Quantifying Criticality of Dependability-Related IT Organization Processes in CobiT.
Gomes , R., & Ribeiro , J. 2009. The Main Benefits Of Cobit In A High Public Educational Institution - A Case Study. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
Grembergen , W., & Haes , S. 2004. Measuring and Improving Information Technology Governance through the Balanced Scorecard.
Grembergen , W., De Haes , S., & Amelinckx , I. 2003. Using COBIT and the Balanced Scorecard as Instruments for Service Level Management. Information Systems Audit and Control Association , 4.
Grembergen , W., De Haes , S., & Moons , J. 2005. Linking Business Goals to IT Goals and COBIT Processes. Information Systems Audit and Control Association .
Guldentops , E. 2004. Governing Information Technology through COBIT.
Haes , S., & Grembergen , W. 2004. IT Governance Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms Achieving IT/Business Alignment in a Major Belgian Financial Group.
Haes, S., Grembergen , W., & Brempt , H. 2009. Demonstrating the Value of CobiT and Val IT IT Governance Practices. ISACA JOURNAL , 5.
Heidari , F., Hashemi , S. M., & Elahifard , E. 2012. Survey and Analyze Processes Status of Information Technology in Electronic Banking Arena by Using Process Maturing View and Main COBIT Model (Case Study: REFAH Bank-Iran). Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2.
Hojaji , F., & Shirazi , M. R. 2008. AUT SOA Governance: A New SOA Governance Framework Based on COBIT.
Hunton, J. E., & Bagranoff, N. A. 2004. Information Technology Auditing. Wiley.
Investor, M. 2012. Investor. Retrieved from Investor Daily Indonesia: http://www.investor.co.id/home/sembilan-perusahaan-asuransi-terbaik-2012/39790
ITGI. 2007. Framework Control Objectives Management Guidelines Maturity Models .
Kania, W. 2011. Pengukuran Tingkat Kemapanan Penerapan Teknologi Rfid Di Perpustakaan Nasional Ri Berdasarkan Framework COBIT 4.1. Pascasarjana IPB.
Kesumawardhani, D. R. 2012. Evaluasi It Governance Berdasarkan COBIT 4.1 (STUDI KASUS DI PT TIMAH (PERSERO) Tbk).
Lapão , L. V. 2011. Organizational Challenges and Barriers to Implementing IT Governance in a Hospital . IHMT , 14, pp37-45 .
Lawton , R. 2007. Transitioning IT From a Compliance to a Value-driven Enterprise Using COBIT . Information Systems Control Journal , 6.
Lin , F., Guan , L., & Fang , W. 2010. Critical Factors Affecting the Evaluation of Information Control Systems with the COBIT Framework. A Study of CPA Firms in Taiwan, 46, pp. 42–55. .
Mapping, C. 2011. COBIT Mapping. Overview of International IT Guidance 3nd edition.
Maria , E., & Haryani , E. 2011. Audit Model Development Of Academic Information System: Case Study On Academic Information System Of Satya Wacana. International Refereed Research Journal , 2.
Marina, A. P., & Krisdanto, S. 2012. erancangan Model Kapabilitas Proses Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Sarjana Institut Teknologi Bandung Bidang Teknik Elektro dan Informatika , 1.
Marrone, M., Hoffmann , L., & Kolbe , L. 2010. IT Executives’ Perception of CobiT: Satisfaction, Business-IT Alignment and Benefits. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information System
Mataracioglu, T., & Ozkan, S. 2005. Governing Information Security In Conjunction With COBIT AND ISO 27001.
Mataracioglu, T., & Ozkan, S. 2010. Governing Information Security In Conjunction With COBIT AND ISO 27001. National Research Institute of Electronics and Cryptology (UEKAE) .
Musa, A. A. 2009. Exploring COBIT Processes for ITG in Saudi Organizations: An empirical Study. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research , 9, pp.99-126 .
Nastase , P., Nastase , F., & Ionescu , C. 2009. Challenges Generated By The Implementation Of The It Standards Cobit 4.1, Itil V3 And Iso/Iec 27002 In Enterprises.
Parent , M., & Reich , B. H. 2009. Governing Information Technology Risk. 51.
Pederiva , A. 2003. The COBIT Maturity Model in a Vendor Evaluation Case. Information Systems Audit and Control Association , 3.
Peterson , R. 2004. Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance. Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance .
Purnomo , L. H., & Tjahyanto , A. 2007. Perancangan Model Tata Kelola Ketersediaan Layanan Ti Menggunakan Framework Cobit Pada BPK-RI.
Purwanto , Y., & Shaufiah . 2010. Audit Teknologi Informasi Dengan Cobit 4.1 Dan Is Risk Assessment (Studi Kasus Bagian Pusat Pengolahan Data PTS XYZ). Konferensi Nasional Sistem dan Informatika
Rhamadhanty, D. 2010. Penerapan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Dengan Menggunakan Cobit Framework 4.1 (Studi Kasus Pada Pt. Indonesia Power).
Ribeiro, J., & Gomes, R. 2010. IT Governance using COBIT implemented in a High Public Educational Institution – A Case Study.
Ridley , G., Pollard , C., & Webb , P. 2006. Attempting to Define IT Governance: Wisdom or Folly? . Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Proceedings of the 39th .
Rudman, R. 2011. Using Control Frameworks To Map Risks In Web 2.0 Applications. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 4, pp. 495–515.
Sasongko , N. 2009. Pengukuran Kinerja Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Framework Cobit Versi. 4.1, Ping Test Dan Caat Pada PT.Bank X Tbk. Di Bandung. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi .
Setiawan , A. 2008. Evaluasi Penerapan Teknologi Informasi Di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Yogyakarta Dengan Menggunakan Model Cobit Framework. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (1907-5022 ).
Setiawan, A. 2010. Pengaruh Kematangan, Kinerja & Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Yogyakarta Dengan Model Cobit Framework. Seminar Nasional Informatika
Simonsson , M. 2008. Predicting It Governance Performance: A Method For Model-Based Decision Making .
Simonsson , M., & Johnson , P. 2005. Defining It Governance A Consolidation Of Literature .
Simonsson , M., & Johnson , P. 2006. Assessment of IT Governance – A Prioritization of Cobit -. 151.
Simonsson, M., & Nordstram, L. 2008. odelling and Evaluating the Maturity of ICT Governance Processes in the Power Industry. SC D2 Information Systems and Telecommunications.
Simonsson, M., Johnson, P., & Wijkström, H. 2006. Model-Based It Governance Maturity Assessments With Cobit.
Steenkamp , G. 2009. Mapping the Information Technology (IT) governance requirements contained in the King III Report to the IT domains and processes of the Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT) framework. Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Accounting (Computer Auditing) .
Sultani. 2012. Pengembangan Aplikasi Audit Sistem Informasi Berdasarkan Cobit Framework Di Rumah Sakit Xxx . Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Terapan .
SWA. 2010. Indonesia Best Brand 2010. p. 40.
Tai, W. 2010. Framework For The Evaluation Of An It Project Portfolio. Umi .
Tanuwijaya , H., & Sarno , R. 2010. Comparation of CobiT Maturity Model and Structural Equation Model for Measuring the Alignment between University Academic Regulations and Information Technology Goals. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security , 10.
Tugas , F. 2010. Assessing The Level Of Information Technology (It) Processes Performance And Capability Maturity In The Philippine Food, Beverage, And Tobacco (Fbt) Industry Using The Cobit Framework. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal , 13, 45.
Weill , P., & Ross , J. 2004. How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results.
