KESEDIAAN MEMBAYAR WORKSHOP KELAS SENI DI KOMUNITAS PERKOTAAN BESAR DI INDONESIA

Tri Widyaningrum; Evelyn Erlina Fortunia; Dimas Radityo Widianto; Ariq Kamil Nugroho; Parhimpunan Simatupang

doi:10.34127/jrlab.v15i1.2011

Authors

Tri Widyaningrum Universitas Prasetiya Mulya
Evelyn Erlina Fortunia Universitas Prasetiya Mulya
Dimas Radityo Widianto Universitas Prasetiya Mulya
Ariq Kamil Nugroho Universitas Prasetiya Mulya
Parhimpunan Simatupang Universitas Prasetiya Mulya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v15i1.2011

Keywords:

Art Workshop, Willingness To Pay, Art Class, Creative Industry, Perceived Value Indonesia, Urban Lifestyle

Abstract

The increasing popularity of creative and experiential activities within Indonesia's urban centers has generated a marked public interest in art education. Nevertheless, there is an absence of empirical data regarding the determinants of consumers' willingness to pay for these services. This research employs a mixed-methods approach, commencing with a qualitative phase. This phase seeks to examine consumer motivations, their perception of value, and their expectations regarding the pricing of art classes. The creation of quantitative instruments for the subsequent validation phase is informed by data from interviews and open-ended survey responses. This study investigates three primary factors influencing willingness to pay (WTP): individual characteristics (including previous workshop attendance, employment status, monthly income, and age), perceptions related to the workshop (specifically, duration, instructor quality, and provider reputation), and price-value evaluations (comprising perceived value relative to cost and additional benefits). The quantitative phase assesses the robustness and significance of these connections. It emphasizes consumers' highest willingness to pay, their perceptions of the fairness of base prices, and their readiness to pay for additional benefits. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of customer behavior in the art workshop industry through the integration of qualitative insights and quantitative validation. The results give significant insights for service providers aiming to formulate pricing strategies, improve service quality, and align their value propositions with the preferences of urban consumers in Indonesia.

References

Al Hassani, A. A., & Wilkins, S. (2022). Student retention in higher education: the influences of organizational identification and institution reputation on student satisfaction and behaviors. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(6), 1046–1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2022-0123

Andrews, M. L., Benedicktus, R. L., & Brady, M. K. (2010). The effect of incentives on customer evaluations of service bundles. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.011

Antara News. (2025). Indonesia’s creative economy adds $90 billion to GDP: minister.

Ardiyani, L. P. C., Pitriani, K., & Suardipa, I. P. (2024). Pelatihan Model Pembelajaran Inovatif bagi Guru Seni Budaya dan Prakarya di SD Gugus 1 Kecamatan Buleleng. EDUCEMARA: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat. https://journal.mpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/educemara/article/view/161

BPS-Statistic Indonesia. (2022). BPS: CREATIVE ECONOMY EMPLOYS 27.4 MILLION WORKERS IN 2025. Https://Www.Bps.Go.Id/En/News/2025/11/17/805/Bps--Creative-Economy-Employs-27-4-Million-Workers-in-2025.Html. https://www.bps.go.id/en/news/2025/11/17/805/bps--creative-economy-employs-27-4-million-workers-in-2025.html

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

BritCham Indonesia. (2022). GDP from Indonesia’s creative economy sector grows by 4.04 percent. https://britcham.or.id/gdp-from-indonesias-creative-economy-sector-grows-by-4-04-percent/

British Council. (2020). Jakarta Creative Practitioners and Hubs Mapping Research. Https://Www.Britishcouncil.Org/Research-Insight/Jakarta-Creative-Economy .

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800305

Drapeau, C. E., Plante, P., & Drouin, M.-S. (2022). Beyond art expression: Understanding participants’ experience and outcomes of a vicarious trauma and response art workshop. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 79, 101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2022.101909

Hanemann, W. M. (2003). Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ?Reply. American Economic Review, 93(1), 464–464. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455449

Jurriëns, E. (2013). Social Participation in Indonesian Media and Art: Echoes from the Past, Visions for the Future. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 169(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-12340021

Kaimal, G., Ray, K., & Muniz, J. (2016). Reduction of Cortisol Levels and Participants’ Responses Following Art Making. Art Therapy, 33(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2016.1166832

Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106

Ma, X. (2023). Social Influence on Digital Content Contribution and Consumption. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6737-7

Mak, H. W., & Fancourt, D. (2021). Do socio-demographic factors predict children’s engagement in arts and culture? Comparisons of in-school and out-of-school participation in the Taking Part Survey. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0246936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246936

Malhotra, N. K. . (2010). Marketing research : an applied orientation. Pearson.

McCarthy, K., Brooks, A., Lowell, J., & Zakaras, L. (2001). The Performing Arts in a New Era. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/MR1367

Mustaqim, K., Yusus, A. A., Marpaung, J. V., Dienputra, D. F., & Maheswari, R. K. (2023). Studi Ruang Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Studio-Based Classroom untuk Kampus Kreatif. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 9(2), 479. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v9i2.1133

Mwita, K. (2024). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4880484

Pine, B. Joseph., & Gilmore, J. H. . (1999). The experience economy : work is theatre & every business a stage. Harvard Business School Press.

Rutledge, P. B., & Hogg, J. L. C. (2020). In‐Depth Interviews. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (pp. 1–7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0019

Saptutyningsih, E., & Pamungkas, P. N. Y. (2019). Assessing the Economic Value of Cultural Heritage Sites: A Case of the Kekayon Puppet Museum in Yogyakarta. Proceedings of the International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism and Information Management, 230–234. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009867702300234

Satu Data Indonesia. (2024). Statistik Jumlah Sarana Kelompok Seni, 2021-2024 oleh Satu Data Indonesia . Https://Data.Go.Id/Dataset/Dataset/Statistik-Jumlah-Sarana-Kelompok-Seni-2021-2024.

Shabina, S., Amit, T. K., & Eram, P. (2024). Focus Group Discussion: An Emerging Qualitative Tool for Educational Research. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(9), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240932

Spee, B. T. M., Pelowski, M., Arato, J., Mikuni, J., Tran, U. S., Eisenegger, C., & Leder, H. (2022). Social reputation influences on liking and willingness-to-pay for artworks: A multimethod design investigating choice behavior along with physiological measures and motivational factors. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0266020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266020

Tracy, S. J. . (2020). Qualitative research methods : collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley Blackwell.

Vahter, E. (2012). Designing the Learning Process in Visual Art Classes in Primary School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.551

Vargo, S. L. ., Lusch, R. F. ., & Koskela-Huotari, Kaisa. (2019). The SAGE handbook of service-dominant logic. SAGE Publications.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Zou, P. X. W., & Xu, X. (2023). Research Methodology and Strategy. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394190256