ANALISIS KESENJANGAN PERILAKU KONSUMEN DALAM KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN PRODUK RAMAH LINGKUNGAN PADA PLATFORM E-COMMERCE INDONESIA

Authors

  • Pance Daniel Universitas Komputer Indonesia
  • R Budi Setiawan Universitas Komputer Indonesia
  • Burhanuddin Universitas Komputer Indonesia
  • Herman Universitas Komputer Indonesia
  • Lilis Puspitawati Universitas Komputer Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v15i2.2289

Keywords:

Purchase Intention, Consumer Behavior Gap, Purchasing Decision, Green Products, E-Commerce

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of green product purchase intention on green product purchasing decisions on Indonesian e-commerce platforms, with the consumer behavior gap as a moderating variable. This research is motivated by the increasing activity of digital shopping, the growth of the e-commerce economy, and the need to understand why consumers’ intentions toward environmentally friendly products do not always translate into actual purchases. The grand theory used in this study is the Theory of Reasoned Action, which explains that behavioral intention serves as an important basis before an individual performs an action. This study employed an explanatory quantitative approach using primary data collected through questionnaires distributed to 120 respondents who were users of Indonesian e-commerce platforms. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling approach. Data analysis was conducted using SEM-PLS through outer model testing, discriminant validity testing, inner model testing, and bootstrapping. The results show that green product purchase intention has a positive and significant effect on green product purchasing decisions, with a coefficient value of 0.220, a t-statistic of 3.113, and a p-value of 0.002. However, the consumer behavior gap was not proven to moderate the effect of purchase intention on purchasing decisions, as the interaction coefficient was only 0.003, with a t-statistic of 0.040 and a p-value of 0.968. The R-square value of 0.729 indicates that the model is able to explain 72.9% of purchasing decisions. These findings indicate that green product purchasing decisions are more strongly determined by the strength of purchase intention than by the interaction effect of the consumer behavior gap.

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

APJII. (2024). APJII jumlah pengguna internet Indonesia tembus 221 juta orang. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang

Apostolopoulos, N., Makris, I., Deirmentzoglou, G. A., & Apostolopoulos, S. (2025). The impact of greenwashing awareness and green perceived benefits on green purchase propensity: The mediating role of green consumer confusion. Sustainability, 17(14), 6589.

Bell, E., Harley, B., & Bryman, A. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.

BPS. (2024). Statistik e-commerce 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2025/11/28/647323224ecc656c2933571b/statistik-e-commerce-2024.html

Costa, C. S. R., da Costa, M. F., Maciel, R. G., Aguiar, E. C., & Wanderley, L. O. (2021). Consumer antecedents towards green product purchase intentions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127964.

ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122556.

Fadhilah, M., & Lukitaningsih, A. (2025, August). The role of brand image in mediating the relationship between the effect of green product and green promotion on purchasing decisions at Starbucks Company in Yogyakarta. In Proceeding of International Conference on Digital, Social, and Science (Vol. 2, No. 01, pp. 554–586).

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, J. (1975). Theory of reasoned action. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 261. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477

Google, Temasek, & Bain. (2024). e-Conomy SEA 2025. https://www.temasek.com.sg/content/dam/temasek-corporate/news-and-views/resources/reports/e_Conomy_SEA_2024_report.pdf

Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392.

Khoiriah, R. I., & Imaningsih, E. S. (2025). Impact of greenwashing, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control on purchase intention for eco-friendly packaged fast-moving consumer goods: The mediating role of green trust. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 6(3), 160–175.

KLH-BPLH. (2025). KLH-BPLH tegaskan arah baru menuju Indonesia bebas sampah 2029 dalam Rakornas Pengelolaan Sampah 2025. https://www.kemenlh.go.id/news/detail/klh-bplh-tegaskan-arah-baru-menuju-indonesia-bebas-sampah-2029-dalam-rakornas-pengelolaan-sampah-2025

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Luca, C. (2025). Consumer behavior and purchasing decisions.

Lv, J., & Liu, X. (2022). The impact of information overload of e-commerce platform on consumer return intention: Considering the moderating role of perceived environmental effectiveness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8060.

Machfoedz, M. (2010). Komunikasi pemasaran modern (Cetakan pertama). Cakra Ilmu.

Nekmahmud, M., Ramkissoon, H., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Tourism Management Perspectives. Tourism Management, 43, 100980.

Nguyen, K. H., & Tran, M. D. (2025). How minimalism drives green purchase intention in collectivist cultures. Sustainability, 17(1), 332.

Nupus, H., Ichwanudin, W., & Worasutr, A. (2025). The role of green perceived value and innovation in small and medium enterprises competitiveness. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan), 9(4), 637–656.

Nuseir, M., Aljumah, A. I., El Refae, G., Alsereidi, M., Almheiri, O., & Almheiri, S. (2025). The effect of celebrity endorsement, advertisement informativeness, and advertisement personalization on customer response: Exploring moderation of perceived ad value. In 2025 12th International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) (pp. 302–308). IEEE.

Oentoeng, I. F., Muslih, M., & Tri Bhakti, S. (2021). Sustainable marketing governance to drive purchasing decisions in online business. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, 5(1), 42–49.

Oetomo, B. S. D., & Santoso, S. (2025). The influence of perceived quality, price perception and social media marketing on green product purchase intention: Case study in Indonesia. Green, Blue and Digital Economy Journal, 6(1), 1–7.

Panjaitan, R., & Cahya, H. N. (2025). A perspective of theory of reasoned action and planned behavior: Purchase decision. Jurnal Manajemen, 29(1), 42–65.

Permadi, I., Nugroho, A., & Widyastuti, S. (2025). Bridging the attitude-behavior gap in green consumption: A systematic literature review and integrative framework. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(3), 14426–14441.

Roy, P., & Datta, D. D. (2022). Theory and models of consumer buying behaviour: A descriptive study. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5349983

Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170

Tawde, S., Kamath, R., & ShabbirHusain, R. V. (2023). “Mind will not mind”: Decoding consumers’ green intention-green purchase behavior gap via moderated mediation effects of implementation intentions and self-efficacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135506.

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3

Wang, X., Peng, M., Li, Y., Ren, M., Ma, T., Zhao, W., & Xu, J. (2025). How e-commerce product environmental information influences green consumption: Intention–behavior gap perspective. Sustainability, 17(6), 2337.

White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49.

Winarni, R. S. D. (2024). The influence of green products on green purchase intention mediated by green brand awareness. International Journal of Applied Finance and Business Studies, 12(1), 44–51.

Zahro, K., Ahmad, G. N., & Krissanya, N. (2025). Green purchase intention influenced by attitude, norms, control, and price sensitivity as a moderation. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen dan Bisnis, 8(1), 33–50.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04