ANALISIS KESALAHAN GRAMATIKA MAHASISWA LP3I POLITEKNIK JAKARTA PADA MATA KULIAH BUSINESS ENGLISH CORRESPONDENCE

Authors

  • Andi Setiawan Politeknik LP3I Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v9i1.346

Abstract

The ability to speak English both verbally and in writtenly for LP3I students is an important asset to be able to compete in the MEA era. However, for them English is not an easy subject to study. This is evident from the results of this study. Business English Correspondence is a course that provides expertise to students in conducting business correspondence in English well and correctly. The purpose of this paper is to find out the mistakes of English grammar in conducting business correspondence both conventional and online. Through the principles of error analysis, it can be seen various types of grammatical errors that are not in accordance with English grammar. There are two forms of errors that are generally distributed by students, namely Interlingual Error and Intralingual Error. The tables and graphs shown in this study describe twelve types of grammatical errors of students who have been classified. Strategic steps to evaluate the teaching methods of this course can be done afterwards.

Key words: Error analysis, English Grammar. Business English Correspondence.

References

Ashley, Aasheim, 2003. Oxford Handbook of Commercial Correspondence. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Arikanto, Suharsini. 2003. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Bumi Aksara.Jakarta.

Boardman, C. A., & Frydenberg, J. 2002. Writing to Communicate: Paragraph and Essays Pearson Education Inc. New York.

Bussmann, Hadumod. 1998. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. Routledge New York. Routledge, s.v. error analysis. A comprehensive bibliography was published by Bernd Spillner (1991), Error Analysis, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in the Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. 2005. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Frede, Michael. 1987. "The origins of traditional grammar". Essays in Ancient Philosophy.University of Minnesota Press.

Helling, Pam. 2000. Grammar and Proofreading Course. American Management Association. New York.

Hendrickson, J.M. 1987. Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. In M.H. Long & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Hermawan, A. Heris.2008. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam.Pustaka Ilmiah. Bandung.

Marshal, Chatarine dan Gretchen B. Rosman. 1995. Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publication. London.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2001. Metedologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung Remaja Rosdakarya.

Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. 2002. Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied linguistics. Longman. London.

Shewan, Edward J. 2006. How to Study: A Practical Guide From a Christian Perspective. Christian Liberty Press. NewYork.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Sugiyono. 2007. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Thornbury, Scott. How to Teach Grammar. Pearson Education . Edinburgh.

Usman, Husaini. Purnomo Setiady Akbar. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial, PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-31

Issue

Section

JURNAL LENTERA BISNIS