ANALISIS KUALITAS PELAYANAN TERHADAP KEPUASAN KONSUMEN (Persepsi Konsumen Hotel Golden Tulip Tangerang)

Authors

  • Pandji Pratopo POLITEKNIK LP3I JAKARTA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v10i2.406

Abstract

Hotels are an element of the tourism industry and play a very important role in providing services to tourists. Each hotel tries to improve its facilities and service quality. If consumers enjoy services that are much lower than they expected, consumers will lose interest in these service providers, and the hotel will eventually lose customers. Conversely, if consumers enjoy services higher than their expectations, then consumers will feel satisfied. Based on the research background, the questions that arise in this study are which factors have the most influence on customer satisfaction on the service quality of the Golden Tulip Hotel Tangerang, and what factors have the greatest influence on customer service expectations of the Golden Tulip Hotel Tangerang. The research model developed in this study consists of four dimensions, namely service quality, consumer expectations, and customer satisfaction, with two hypotheses to be tested. The test was carried out using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis tool in the LISREL program on 100 respondents who were consumers of the Golden Tulip Hotel Tangerang. The results of data analysis indicate that the two proposed hypotheses are acceptable, and it can be concluded that service quality has a positive effect on customer satisfaction, and consumer expectations have a positive effect on customer satisfaction. This study also links the research results with the theoretical implications and policies of the Golden Tulip Hotel Tangerang management, which are described in the conclusion section. Research limitations and future research agendas can be used as a reference for future researchers.

Keywords: service quality, customer expectations, customer satisfaction

References

Anderson. Eugene W, Claes Fornell, Donald R. Lehmann, 1994, “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings From Sweden”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 58

Cooper, Donald R dan C. William Emory, 2004. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Jilid 1, Edisi kelima. Penerjemah: Dra. Ellen Gunawan, M.A., dan Tamam Nurmawan, S.E. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Cronin, J. Joseph, Jr Steven A. Taylor. 1992. “Measuring Service Quality: A. Reexamination and Extension”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 56, pp 125-131.

Duffy, Jo Ann M and Alice Ketchad, 1998, “Examining The Role of Service Quality in Overall Service Satisfaction,” Journal of Manajeriai Issues. Vol. X, No. 2, pp 240 – 255.

Ferdinand, Augusty. 2011. Structural Equation Modelling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen, Semarang: BP Undip.

Fomell, Claes, Et al, 1996, “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings”. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, pp. 7-16

Hair, F. Joseph, et.al, 1996, Multivariate Data Analysis With Reading, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall New Jersey.

Kotler, Philip. 2010. Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi tiga belas Bahasa Indonesia.Jilid 1 dan 2. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Nazir, Moh. 2013. Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Parasuraman. A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry. 1994, “Reassesment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality; Implications for Further Research”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, pp 111-124.

Singgih Santoso dan Tjiptono. 2001. Riset Pemasaran Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Spreng, Richard A., Scott B. Mackenzie, Richard W. Olshavsky, 1996, “Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing, vol.60, pp 15-32.

Tjiptono, Fandy. 2014, Pemasaran Jasa – Prinsip, Penerapan, dan Penelitian, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.

Umar, Husein. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian, Aplikasi dalam Pemasaran, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-26

Issue

Section

JURNAL LENTERA BISNIS